On Monday, after completion of a month’s worth of business, the Van Buren Public Schools Board of Education listened to representatives of about 35 parents and others in their audience.
One of the issues was the recent announcement by School Supt. Michael Van Tassel that he was investigating the high MSTEP scores of Savage Elementary School after an alleged inquiry from the state.
Parent Michael Gentz began the questions, saying he was offended on behalf of the staff. He said his own students took those tests and he was surprised to see Van Tassel’s letter in the paper and on the district website. He said a similar incident happened at Haggerty Elementary a few years back and there was never a word about it from the district.
He said in the recent MSTEP results, Tyler Elementary doubled its proficiency rate from 32 to 62 and nothing was said about it.
Gentz said students at Savage, eight or nine years of age, were questioned about the tests that were taken months earlier. Faculty members were questioned without union representation.
“They are trying to find something bad,” he said, asking if the letter from the state that brought on this investigation could be made public.
“The staff of Savage is being thrown under the bus,” Gentz said. He said his son had sheer exhaustion over taking several days of testing and, “My own child’s test score is being called into question.”
School Board president Brent Mikulski said the district received a communication from the state on Friday and the district will have a discussion with the parents, “once we understand” what it says.
Gentz asked for a report on the progress of the investigation that included questioning of students and faculty plus the results of other schools and why they are singling out Savage.
Gentz said, “These are discussions that parents should be involved in.”
The second parent speaking was Richard Rytman, who congratulated the new principal at Savage, Amy Gee, on the recent birth of her fifth child and applauded Curriculum Director Jeff Moore for immediately improving the math program when he took over.
Then Rytman reminded board members that he was the parent who was before them six months ago questioning teacher morale. He said he didn’t know if the number of teachers leaving was an inordinate number and he offered to help fund a climate survey. He said for businesses — and the district is run like a business — it’s crucial to have a survey like this every two years.
[The Independent counted the number of teachers/administrators leaving the district during the 2014-15 school year and it was 54, higher than any year in the last five and a half years. This included resignations and retirements.]
He recalled that the board obviously wasn’t interested in a climate survey.
He said with former Savage Principal Kelley Villa resigning last summer there was no follow-up with the board for why she left.
“It left a perception and the rumor mills started,” he said, noting the rumors are what the public perceives as the truth.
“When we talked about exit interviews, did anyone reach out to find out why she left?” Rytman said. “Not to give any response looks like the board is trying to do a cover-up.”
Rytman asked, “Did anyone look…” and president Mikulski said Rytman’s three minutes were up.
Mikulski said the district has done a work culture survey.
Van Tassle they will discuss the National Climate Survey that was done at the Jan. 25 work/study meeting of the board, among other topics.
Rytman asked if they will explain how the test was handed out and how it was done.
Moore said last summer there was a lot of discussion, and really, even before the summer there were discussions about a survey. He said they rolled out the process. He said it was an on-line survey and he just received the results in early December. He said every building principal has those results.
Trustee Sherry Frazier questioned if the survey asked how the staff perceives the administration.
Moore said there wasn’t the ability to identify individuals taking the test.
Rytman, a former FBI agent, said one of his former occupations was as a prosecutor. He said he knows that if they were interviewing a child a lot of time the way a child answers a question is based on how the question is asked.
“I don’t want to have the board involved in a class-action law suit,” he said, noting, “Scores shoot up and you look for wrong-doing. A kneejerk reaction.”
Mikulski said the investigation will be wrapped up this week and shared with the public.
When attorney Barbara Miller asked from the audience if the letter from the state was very long, Mikulski said it was the “content not the length” that delayed information being released.
Miller stated the letter should be made public. She stated she is starting a local chapter of the League of Women Voters which will be able to disseminate information on the millage election in May to help the district. New state law says the school board must not give information on a millage election 60 days before the election.
Rytman asked how many teachers and administrators had left the district and Mikulski said there had been no follow-up on that.
Rytman insisted that the first thing a Human Resources officer does when someone resigns is to have an exit interview. The HR person asks why the employee is leaving. For example, is it for better pay?
“When we have a high level of employees leaving … We’d like to unravel why they are leaving.”
“I’m still very concerned,” said Trustee Frazier. “They are not going to do exit interviews,” she said to Rytman, referring to fellow board members, who have stated they will not vote for exit interviews.
Frazier said she talked to an employee who left in the middle of the school year, and Mikulski interrupted her and tried to get her to stop talking. She said there were three teachers at Owen that left.
Mikulski kept trying to shut her up and Frazier called out, “This needs to be discussed!”
Mikulski shut down the meeting.
No other board members spoke out about the parents’ concerns.
- Previous story School Board votes to put 18-mill renewal on May 3 election ballot
- Next story League of Women Voters to meet at The Q Banquet and Event Center
Why not do an exit interview we are at will?
There needs to be more investigation as to why there were 54 teachers/staff leaving the district. As a community, we need to address the elephant in the room. So we just let staff come in and question students? Were all the students questioned? This sounds like a typical Van Tassel witch hunt. The school board needs to recognize the narcissistic behavior of the superintendent. As a community, we need to band together and realize that the superintendent is not looking out for the students and the staff. He has his own agenda. Everyone knows it and frankly, something needs to happen.
Wait, students were questioned about the MSTEP? Why? Were their parents contacted? This all sounds so shady and weird. I’m not a resident of this community but I came across this article and find it all so suspect. I would think if 54 teachers left, the district would want to know why. Frankly, I would think there would be 235 people in attendance at a meeting like this. What say you, school board and superintendent? No comment?
This Van Tassel person needs to be fired. Period.
i find it interesting that nobody is complaining that there was cheating going on by the principal and teachers. Cheating. Holy cowboys…where are the priorities here? Great example for my kid. The state of Michigan demanded an investigation! This wasn’t about personalities, it was about criminal activity. Get with it people…your teachers are cheaters. It is really concerning that none of you get it.
George- surely you must have information as to your alleged accusations? Do you care to share with the rest of the class?
George- do you have some information as to the alleged accusation of cheating? With such confidence, you must have something. Care to share with the rest of the class?
Michigan Department of Education has verified that the investigation was initiated by the District!! Would suggest that people find out the truth. As you can see, your not getting that from the Ad Building, district, or the School board President. Would suggest that people start out by asking how many law suits has Mr. V has had, that’s right cant find them, he settles them all with a settlement that has a gag order attached to it?? Why? Who pays $ for it…not him! Exit letters who would it hurt if your trying to become a better district, what are you trying to hide??? Hey MV remember that issue you had with that women when you were an Asst Principal? When you wouldn’t take Middle School Principal job, you forced Lazaroff to give you Cir Dir job…people need to start asking questions!!! The truth shall set you free. MV
I couldn’t agree more with you Mike. VT is known for being unscrupulous. People think they know what is going on in this district, but they will be utterly shocked when they find out what is going on. It is just a matter of time.
What proof do you have that the state “demanded” an investigation? Are you involved in the investigation? Because that sort of allegation sounds like someone who is either directly involved or is close with those directly involved. Are you an administrator or current/former board member? Perhaps you’d like to shed some light on this.
Hi “George”–
My kid was one of the alleged cheaters. He did not cheat. No one helped him with the test. I have serious questions as to the timeline of what went on. The letters from the state that are posted are dated in December and January. The interviewing of the students and teachers I am hearing started in October. Why were we as a district interviewing students and teachers before there was a letter from the state? Is there an earlier letter from October that we have yet to see? Or did we report on ourselves? And if we reported on ourselves, what brought that on? What is going on? There are a lot of questions. This reflects ON OUR KIDS. My kid spent all that time taking a test that does not count. I know these Savage teachers and the principal. I do not believe that they cheated. Every student I have talked to said no one helped them other than helping them log on. The teachers did not supervise their own kids in most cases from what I hear. What benefit was there to the teachers to do well on this first year of a test? That would just mean you would have to do even better the following year correct? I would really like some answers. This has me so upset and I am not the only parent who is upset. What on earth is going on?
Andrea- you bring up some interesting points. I’ve heard some of the questions going back and forth in regards to the timeline. I agree, it doesn’t make sense. Also, you hit the nail o the head in regards to the first year of the test. what is the advantage of getting a high score? people are starting to question what is going on.